Wolfire Games Forums

They're a natural part of the mammal body and they should be included. Not as a sexual thing or anything, but because I think that anthropomorphic animals like the whaleman look quite silly and fake when they have Barbie crotches. On top of that, simply including genitals does not make a game inappropriate in any way. I believe that anyone who makes a big deal out of it is probably echoing some other self-righteous bickerer who is probably echoing some other self-righteous bickerer, etcetera, and it all got out of hand. Are genitals really offensive, especially animal ones? Especially compared to huge blood-baths and the breaking of rabbits' and other furry animals' spines?

I realize the commercial implications of this, it's usually more profitable to stay on the politically correct side. But say that the Wolfire team saw another anthropomorphic animal fighting game being developed, or the team were making Overgrowth as a part-time hobby free of charge or something, would you be for or against genitals being included? I'm especially interested as to what Overgrowth's devs think about this, so make sure you guys reply.

It's just a personal choice. We don't want to look at that, and don't think it will add anything to the game, so there will be no genitals.

OOOOOH SHUT DOWN! ROCK ON JEFF!~

Many small mammals' reproductive organs are hidden mostly inside the body anyway, So while you might see dogs with huge lipsticks hanging out and certain rodents with testes the size of basketballs, you probably won't see much on a rabbit. Especially not a human-like phallus. Females can, of course, pretty much go with the 'barbie crotch' look.

Tonjevic wrote:Many small mammals' reproductive organs are hidden mostly inside the body anyway, So while you might see dogs with huge lipsticks hanging out and certain rodents with testes the size of basketballs, you probably won't see much on a rabbit. Especially not a human-like phallus. Females can, of course, pretty much go with the 'barbie crotch' look.

You're speaking as if the characters would be constantly aroused, and that's not what Skofo is saying at all. Americans tend to be the only ones squeamish about showing genitals.

I was surprised one day when my Korean cousin was describing comic books in South Korea. Apparently they would freely draw genitals on young characters if they were in some situation where caught nude. This isn't "hentai" comics he's talking about either. Just plain mainstream comics.

When you look at domestic animals in real life that's just something you see all the time.
I think Skofo is saying since most of it is covered in fur that it wouldn't be blatantly in your face. I could totally see balls being included but of course penis wouldn't be necessary.

Jeff, if you still have Watership Down go to the end of the movie where the dog is attacking the rabbits. Don't let the dog's balls hit you in the face. ;P

It's artistic.

Hazel-roo wrote:

Tonjevic wrote:Many small mammals' reproductive organs are hidden mostly inside the body anyway, So while you might see dogs with huge lipsticks hanging out and certain rodents with testes the size of basketballs, you probably won't see much on a rabbit. Especially not a human-like phallus. Females can, of course, pretty much go with the 'barbie crotch' look.

You're speaking as if the characters would be constantly aroused, and that's not what Skofo is saying at all.

I guess for the dog, the lipstick is sheathed or whatever, but there are various rats, squirrels etc. which have enourmous scrotums even if they're not aroused.

most of the characters in Lugaru were wearing pants ... I don't see why genitalia would be too much trouble! Hehe ... I can just imagine all the sickening things you do with genitalia and a dagger ...

Jeff wrote:It's just a personal choice. We don't want to look at that, and don't think it will add anything to the game, so there will be no genitals.

One word.
De-light-ed.

I don't see why Skofo and Hazel-roo are obsessed with there being genitals. What's it going to achieve? Am I going to see the animals' genitals and go "Ohh, those are finely rendered genitals, I'm enjoying this game!"

If you really want those, learn how to add them in mods like in other games, for god sake.

Renegade_Turner wrote:

Jeff wrote:It's just a personal choice. We don't want to look at that, and don't think it will add anything to the game, so there will be no genitals.

One word.
De-light-ed.

I don't see why Skofo and Hazel-roo are obsessed with there being genitals. What's it going to achieve? Am I going to see the animals' genitals and go "Ohh, those are finely rendered genitals, I'm enjoying this game!"

I'm not obsessed at all. I don't need them to be happy. I just think it would be kind of cool. It would show that you're not afraid of showing that kind of stuff. I mean... this isn't a kid's game and other cultures in the world have no problem showing that kind of stuff. It would prove once and for all that Turner is a real man! RAWR!

Skofo wrote:They're a natural part of the mammal body and they should be included. Not as a sexual thing or anything, but because I think that anthropomorphic animals like the whaleman look quite silly and fake when they have Barbie crotches. On top of that, simply including genitals does not make a game inappropriate in any way. I believe that anyone who makes a big deal out of it is probably echoing some other self-righteous bickerer who is probably echoing some other self-righteous bickerer, etcetera, and it all got out of hand. Are genitals really offensive, especially animal ones? Especially compared to huge blood-baths and the breaking of rabbits' and other furry animals' spines?

I realize the commercial implications of this, it's usually more profitable to stay on the politically correct side. But say that the Wolfire team saw another anthropomorphic animal fighting game being developed, or the team were making Overgrowth as a part-time hobby free of charge or something, would you be for or against genitals being included? I'm especially interested as to what Overgrowth's devs think about this, so make sure you guys reply.

Even more furry porn :l
Also, it would look frikkin' silly. No genitalia.
Also, there shall be genitalia mod some point. Im sure.

Hmm, a slow-motion closeup of a guy's baaawls getting kicked, causing him to get knocked down forever and ever.

ummm, that's the only implementation I can think of, for comedy, lol =o

Why would you even suggest this? What's the point?

It's not about the inclusion of balls, it's about what those balls represent.

If they include scripting and you want to script in a shot of someone getting hit in the nuts where that part moves realistically, we can't stop you, but it's been pretty established that Wolfire aren't doing it themselves.